You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I like the idea: it should lead to less false positives, which is very important. It could even help spot typos in directive names!
As long as it's still fast to check a single file, so it can be used as a linter in an editor, I don't want rstlint to become slower than make suspicious from cpython, on my machine, for a full cpython/Doc/ check:
sphinx-lint takes 5.7s
make suspicious takes from 36s to 1m22s (depends on the cache)
I wonder that if this is being done, than the speed promise goes out the window. In that case it would be good to offer some other slower but less error-prone interfaces, mainly a sphinx-builder that would pick up the exact sources being used.
Activity
jeanas commentedon Feb 3, 2022
Not sure if I'll have the time soon, but I'm basically interested in working on this.
LecrisUT commentedon Dec 17, 2025
I wonder that if this is being done, than the speed promise goes out the window. In that case it would be good to offer some other slower but less error-prone interfaces, mainly a sphinx-builder that would pick up the exact sources being used.