Skip to content

Improve PR review checklist #962

Open

Description

@ezio-melotti

In python/cpython#93823 (comment) @erlend-aasland wrote a checklist about reviewing PRs.

In #914 (comment), I suggested:

SGTM -- that's a nice list. I think it would be easier to add it in a separate PR though.
Reviewing PRs is currently documented in two places:

The former has been likely written from scratch after the HG->Git migration, whereas the latter formerly documented how to review patches attached to a bpo issue and then it has been adapted to GitHub. I think the best approach would be to enhance the pull-request-lifecycle with your list, and remove the duplicated info in triaging.

Activity

  1. erlend-aasland commented on Oct 10, 2022

    @erlend-aasland
    Contributor

    Thanks for the PR! Can we close this?

  2. ezio-melotti commented on Oct 12, 2022

    @ezio-melotti
    MemberAuthor

    #914 only included the changes that I had initially created, and I now merged it to keep things moving incrementally like Diataxis suggests.
    The checklist you suggested in the comment linked above is more comprehensive and can still be integrated in the devguide to improve the current checklist, so I opened this issue as a reminder.

  3. abdnafees commented on Nov 24, 2022

    @abdnafees
    Contributor

    @ezio-melotti Can I please work on this issue?

  4. added
    type-bugEditing of existing content needed
    type-featureAdditions; New content or section needed
    and removed
    type-featureAdditions; New content or section needed
    on Oct 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions