Skip to content

Constant folding is skipped in named expressions #86448

Closed

Description

@ncoghlan
BPO 42282
Nosy @ncoghlan
PRs
  • bpo-42282: Fold constants inside named expressions #23190
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = 'https://github.com/ncoghlan'
    closed_at = <Date 2020-11-07.12:36:30.609>
    created_at = <Date 2020-11-07.06:59:44.846>
    labels = ['3.10', 'performance']
    title = 'Constant folding is skipped in named expressions'
    updated_at = <Date 2020-11-07.12:36:30.609>
    user = 'https://github.com/ncoghlan'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2020-11-07.12:36:30.609>
    actor = 'ncoghlan'
    assignee = 'ncoghlan'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2020-11-07.12:36:30.609>
    closer = 'ncoghlan'
    components = []
    creation = <Date 2020-11-07.06:59:44.846>
    creator = 'ncoghlan'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 42282
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 3.0
    messages = ['380494', '380505', '380506']
    nosy_count = 1.0
    nosy_names = ['ncoghlan']
    pr_nums = ['23190']
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = 'fixed'
    stage = 'resolved'
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = 'performance'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue42282'
    versions = ['Python 3.10']

    Activity

    1. ncoghlan commented on Nov 7, 2020

      @ncoghlan
      ContributorAuthor

      While working on the PEP-642 reference implementation I removed the "default:" case from the switch statement in astfold_expr as part of making sure the new SkippedBinding node was being handled everywhere it needed to be.

      This change picked up that NamedExpr_kind wasn't being handled either, and a check with the dis module confirmed that using the walrus operator turns off constant folding:

      [ncoghlan@thechalk cpython]$ ./python
      Python 3.10.0a2+ (heads/pep-642-constraint-patterns-dirty:4db2fbd609, Nov  7 2020, 16:42:19) 
      [GCC 10.2.1 20201016 (Red Hat 10.2.1-6)] on linux
      Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
      >>> import dis
      >>> dis.dis("1 + 1")
        1           0 LOAD_CONST               0 (2)
                    2 RETURN_VALUE
      >>> dis.dis("(x := 1 + 1)")
        1           0 LOAD_CONST               0 (1)
                    2 LOAD_CONST               0 (1)
                    4 BINARY_ADD
                    6 DUP_TOP
                    8 STORE_NAME               0 (x)
                   10 RETURN_VALUE
      >>>
      

      The missing switch statement entry is just:

          case NamedExpr_kind:
              CALL(astfold_expr, expr_ty, node_->v.NamedExpr.value);
              break;
      

      Which gives the expected result:

      [ncoghlan@thechalk cpython]$ ./python -c "import dis; dis.dis('(x := 1 +1)')"
        1           0 LOAD_CONST               0 (2)
                    2 DUP_TOP
                    4 STORE_NAME               0 (x)
                    6 RETURN_VALUE
      
    2. ncoghlan commented on Nov 7, 2020

      @ncoghlan
      ContributorAuthor

      New changeset 8805a4d by Nick Coghlan in branch 'master':
      bpo-42282: Fold constants inside named expressions (GH-23190)
      8805a4d

    3. ncoghlan commented on Nov 7, 2020

      @ncoghlan
      ContributorAuthor

      Since this was only a performance issue, I'm not planning to backport it to earlier releases.

    4. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions