Skip to content

[doc] Incorrect documentation for strftime()/strptime() format code %f #77562

Description

@jujuwoman
mannequin
BPO 33381
Nosy @freddrake, @MojoVampire, @pganssle, @miss-islington, @jujuwoman, @iritkatriel, @vishalpandeyvip
PRs
  • bpo-33381: [doc] strftime's %f option may pad zeros on the left or the right #29801
  • [3.10] bpo-33381: [doc] strftime's %f option may pad zeros on the left or the right (GH-29801) #29862
  • [3.9] bpo-33381: [doc] strftime's %f option may pad zeros on the left or the right (GH-29801) #29863
  • Files
  • Bug description.py: MWE of the bug
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = <Date 2021-11-30.11:51:15.436>
    created_at = <Date 2018-04-29.01:06:18.507>
    labels = ['easy', 'type-bug', '3.9', '3.10', '3.11', 'library', 'docs']
    title = '[doc] Incorrect documentation for strftime()/strptime() format code %f'
    updated_at = <Date 2021-11-30.11:51:15.435>
    user = 'https://github.com/jujuwoman'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2021-11-30.11:51:15.435>
    actor = 'iritkatriel'
    assignee = 'docs@python'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2021-11-30.11:51:15.436>
    closer = 'iritkatriel'
    components = ['Documentation', 'Library (Lib)']
    creation = <Date 2018-04-29.01:06:18.507>
    creator = 'jujuwoman'
    dependencies = []
    files = ['47556']
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 33381
    keywords = ['patch', 'easy', 'newcomer friendly']
    message_count = 8.0
    messages = ['315873', '316110', '321106', '407353', '407357', '407362', '407363', '407364']
    nosy_count = 8.0
    nosy_names = ['fdrake', 'docs@python', 'josh.r', 'p-ganssle', 'miss-islington', 'jujuwoman', 'iritkatriel', 'vishalpandeyvip']
    pr_nums = ['29801', '29862', '29863']
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = 'fixed'
    stage = 'resolved'
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = 'behavior'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue33381'
    versions = ['Python 3.9', 'Python 3.10', 'Python 3.11']

    Activity

    1. jujuwoman commented on Apr 29, 2018

      jujuwomanmannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      According to https://docs.python.org/3/library/datetime.html, %f is zero-padded on the left. But actual Python 3 behavior is puts the zero padding on the right.

    2. MojoVampire commented on May 3, 2018

      MojoVampiremannequin
      Mannequin

      Note: strftime follows the existing documentation:

      >>> datetime.datetime(1970, 1, 1, microsecond=1).strftime('%f')
      '000001'

      The strptime behavior bug seems like a duplicate of bpo-32267, which claims to be fixed in master as of early January; may not have made it into a release yet though. I can't figure out how to view the patch on that issue, it doesn't seem to be linked to GitHub like normal.

    3. pganssle commented on Jul 5, 2018

      @pganssle
      Member

      I don't believe this is a duplicate if bpo-32267, which is actually about the %z directive.

      I think the implementation here is correct and the documentation is semi-correct, it depends on how you look at it, consider:

      >>> datetime(2018, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1).strftime('%f')
      '000001'
      
      >>> datetime(2018, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 100000).strftime('%f')
      '100000'

      In the first case "1" got expanded to "000001" and "100000" was printed as-is. However, when you interpret it as being *after* the decimal point, you would consider the first one to not be zero-padded at all and the second one to be zero-padded on the right.

      I think the documentation can just be changed to "zero-padded to 6 digits" without specifying left or right.

    4. added
      3.11only security fixes
      docsDocumentation in the Doc dir
      stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
      on Nov 23, 2021
    5. changed the title [-]Incorrect documentation for strftime()/strptime() format code %f[/-] [+][doc] Incorrect documentation for strftime()/strptime() format code %f[/+] on Nov 23, 2021
    6. vishalpandeyvip commented on Nov 30, 2021

      vishalpandeyvipmannequin
      Mannequin

      I have made a PR into the repository, can anyone please review and merge it.

    7. iritkatriel commented on Nov 30, 2021

      @iritkatriel
      Member

      New changeset f97ec09 by Vishal Pandey in branch 'main':
      bpo-33381: [doc] strftime's %f option may pad zeros on the left or the right (GH-29801)
      f97ec09

    8. iritkatriel commented on Nov 30, 2021

      @iritkatriel
      Member

      New changeset 3975142 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.10':
      bpo-33381: [doc] strftime's %f option may pad zeros on the left or the right (GH-29801) (GH-29862)
      3975142

    9. iritkatriel commented on Nov 30, 2021

      @iritkatriel
      Member

      New changeset 031e2bb by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9':
      bpo-33381: [doc] strftime's %f option may pad zeros on the left or the right (GH-29801) (GH-29863)
      031e2bb

    10. iritkatriel commented on Nov 30, 2021

      @iritkatriel
      Member

      Thank you Judy and Vishal!

    11. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    No one assigned

      Labels

      3.10 (EOL)end of life3.11only security fixes3.9 (EOL)end of lifedocsDocumentation in the Doc direasystdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions