You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Make the behavior of USE_STACKCHECK deterministic #76038
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee=Noneclosed_at=<Date2017-10-26.06:03:32.728>created_at=<Date2017-10-24.01:09:21.961>labels= ['type-bug', '3.7', 'OS-windows']
title='Make the behavior of USE_STACKCHECK deterministic'updated_at=<Date2020-03-17.01:04:51.773>user='https://github.com/pdox'
USE_STACKCHECK is a Windows-only feature which provides additional safety against C stack overflow by periodically calling PyOS_CheckStack to determine whether the current thread is too close to the end of the stack.
The way USE_STACKCHECK ensures that PyOS_CheckStack is called frequently is surprising. It does this by artificially decrementing _Py_CheckRecursionLimit with every call to Py_EnterRecursiveCall:
#ifdefUSE_STACKCHECK/* With USE_STACKCHECK, we artificially decrement the recursion limit in order to trigger regular stack checks in _Py_CheckRecursiveCall(), except if the "overflowed" flag is set, in which case we need the true value of _Py_CheckRecursionLimit for _Py_MakeEndRecCheck() to function properly. */# define_Py_MakeRecCheck(x) \
(++(x) > (_Py_CheckRecursionLimit += PyThreadState_GET()->overflowed - 1))
#else# define_Py_MakeRecCheck(x) (++(x) > _Py_CheckRecursionLimit)
#endif
_Py_CheckRecursionLimit defaults to 1000, and is constant when USE_STACKCHECK is off. (except when changed by Py_SetRecursionLimit)
With a single thread, each call to Py_EnterRecursiveCall causes _Py_CheckRecursionLimit to decrement by 1 until it equals the current recursion depth, at which point _Py_CheckRecursiveCall is triggered, resetting _Py_CheckRecursionLimit back to the default. This could be anywhere from 500 to 1000 calls depending on the recursion depth. With multiple threads, the behavior may be more chaotic, as each thread will be decrementing _Py_CheckRecursionLimit independently.
I propose that instead, the call to PyOS_CheckStack is triggered in a predictable fashion, using a separate counter for each thread, so that it occurs every N'th call to Py_EnterRecursiveCall. (N = 64 seems reasonable, as PyOS_CheckStack guarantees 2048 * sizeof(void*) bytes remaining on the C stack).
Activity
pdox commentedon Oct 24, 2017
USE_STACKCHECK is a Windows-only feature which provides additional safety against C stack overflow by periodically calling PyOS_CheckStack to determine whether the current thread is too close to the end of the stack.
The way USE_STACKCHECK ensures that PyOS_CheckStack is called frequently is surprising. It does this by artificially decrementing _Py_CheckRecursionLimit with every call to Py_EnterRecursiveCall:
_Py_CheckRecursionLimit defaults to 1000, and is constant when USE_STACKCHECK is off. (except when changed by Py_SetRecursionLimit)
With a single thread, each call to Py_EnterRecursiveCall causes _Py_CheckRecursionLimit to decrement by 1 until it equals the current recursion depth, at which point _Py_CheckRecursiveCall is triggered, resetting _Py_CheckRecursionLimit back to the default. This could be anywhere from 500 to 1000 calls depending on the recursion depth. With multiple threads, the behavior may be more chaotic, as each thread will be decrementing _Py_CheckRecursionLimit independently.
I propose that instead, the call to PyOS_CheckStack is triggered in a predictable fashion, using a separate counter for each thread, so that it occurs every N'th call to Py_EnterRecursiveCall. (N = 64 seems reasonable, as PyOS_CheckStack guarantees 2048 * sizeof(void*) bytes remaining on the C stack).
benjaminp commentedon Oct 26, 2017
New changeset 1896793 by Benjamin Peterson (pdox) in branch 'master':
bpo-31857: Make the behavior of USE_STACKCHECK deterministic (bpo-4098)
1896793
vstinner commentedon Nov 4, 2019
This issue added this FIXME:
/* Due to the macros in which it's used, _Py_CheckRecursionLimit is in
the stable ABI. It should be removed therefrom when possible.
*/
FYI I proposed PR 17046 to fix it ;-)