Repository navigation
Simplify the Integral ABC #47306
Description
| BPO | 3056 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @gvanrossum, @rhettinger, @ezio-melotti |
| Files |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2011-04-13.01:25:29.868>
created_at = <Date 2008-06-07.01:57:24.805>
labels = ['library']
title = 'Simplify the Integral ABC'
updated_at = <Date 2013-04-14.09:59:05.283>
user = 'https://github.com/rhettinger'bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2013-04-14.09:59:05.283>
actor = 'python-dev'
assignee = 'jyasskin'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2011-04-13.01:25:29.868>
closer = 'rhettinger'
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2008-06-07.01:57:24.805>
creator = 'rhettinger'
dependencies = []
files = ['10539', '10540', '10634']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 3056
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 12.0
messages = ['67792', '67826', '67941', '68253', '68256', '68318', '68332', '68333', '68991', '90103', '133631', '186901']
nosy_count = 5.0
nosy_names = ['gvanrossum', 'rhettinger', 'jyasskin', 'ezio.melotti', 'python-dev']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'low'
resolution = 'out of date'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue3056'
versions = ['Python 3.3']
Activity
rhettinger commentedon Jun 7, 2008
rhettinger commentedon Jun 8, 2008
Is the patch good to go?
gvanrossum commentedon Jun 11, 2008
Not really, see the reply I sent to the checkin mail.
rhettinger commentedon Jun 16, 2008
Not much feedback on comp.lang.python.
Does numbers3.diff look like what you had in mind?
gvanrossum commentedon Jun 16, 2008
Mostly, but I *really* want to see unittests for this.
rhettinger commentedon Jun 17, 2008
Jeffrey, do you have an interest in taking it from here?
gvanrossum commentedon Jun 17, 2008
Raymond, mind if we roll back your previous (incorrect) changes? They
really should not have been submitted in the first place.
rhettinger commentedon Jun 17, 2008
No problem. Whatever you think is best.
Still hoping that Jeffrey can take a look at the mixin approach and the
__rand__ logic. No one else seems to have an interest and I won't have
time to write the tests for a few days (they are complicated because
Integral requires so many abstract methods to be defined before it will
instantiate).
jyasskin commentedon Jun 30, 2008
Yeah, I'll take a look. Feel free to bug me if I haven't gotten to it in
a couple more days.
ezio-melotti commentedon Jul 4, 2009
Ping?
rhettinger commentedon Apr 13, 2011
I've long since lost interest in this.
If anyone wants to push it forward,
feel free to re-open.
python-dev commentedon Apr 14, 2013
New changeset 4678259af5a4 by Georg Brandl in branch '2.7':
The Integral class does not contain implementations for the bit-shifting operations. (See bpo-3056.)
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4678259af5a4
New changeset 1d4ba14cc505 by Georg Brandl in branch '3.3':
The Integral class does not contain implementations for the bit-shifting operations. (See bpo-3056.)
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1d4ba14cc505