Skip to content

rename test_support to support #46873

Closed
Closed

Description

@benjaminp
BPO 2621
Nosy @loewis, @brettcannon, @birkenfeld, @benjaminp
Files
  • rename_test_support.patch
  • rename_test_support2.patch
  • rename_test_support_py3k.patch
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = 'https://github.com/benjaminp'
    closed_at = <Date 2008-05-20.21:38:20.881>
    created_at = <Date 2008-04-12.00:32:24.582>
    labels = ['easy', 'type-feature', 'tests', 'release-blocker']
    title = 'rename test_support to support'
    updated_at = <Date 2008-05-20.22:09:32.204>
    user = 'https://github.com/benjaminp'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2008-05-20.22:09:32.204>
    actor = 'brett.cannon'
    assignee = 'benjamin.peterson'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2008-05-20.21:38:20.881>
    closer = 'benjamin.peterson'
    components = ['Tests']
    creation = <Date 2008-04-12.00:32:24.582>
    creator = 'benjamin.peterson'
    dependencies = []
    files = ['10014', '10015', '10018']
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 2621
    keywords = ['patch', 'easy']
    message_count = 12.0
    messages = ['65385', '65392', '65396', '65403', '65597', '65598', '66301', '67086', '67110', '67124', '67137', '67138']
    nosy_count = 4.0
    nosy_names = ['loewis', 'brett.cannon', 'georg.brandl', 'benjamin.peterson']
    pr_nums = []
    priority = 'release blocker'
    resolution = 'accepted'
    stage = None
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = 'enhancement'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue2621'
    versions = ['Python 3.0']

    Activity

    1. benjaminp commented on Apr 12, 2008

      @benjaminp
      ContributorAuthor

      I used some brute force search and replace for this and it worked quite
      well. If this patch is accepted, I'll fix the docs.

    2. loewis commented on Apr 12, 2008

      loewismannequin
      Mannequin

      What's the rationale for this change?

    3. birkenfeld commented on Apr 12, 2008

      @birkenfeld
      Member

      It would be nice if all test.test_foo modules were real tests.

      I know this is on the stdlib-sig's list of changes for 3.0; I don't
      think we should do the rename in 2.x.

    4. benjaminp commented on Apr 12, 2008

      @benjaminp
      ContributorAuthor

      Right, we should do this only in Py3k. It might be helpful to make an
      alias in 2.6 for it. Attaching py3k patch.

    5. benjaminp commented on Apr 17, 2008

      @benjaminp
      ContributorAuthor

      Brett, comments?

    6. brettcannon commented on Apr 18, 2008

      @brettcannon
      Member

      I am going to assign this to me, but wait until Guido pronounces on PEP-3108 before moving forward with a review.

    7. self-assigned this
      on Apr 18, 2008
    8. benjaminp commented on May 6, 2008

      @benjaminp
      ContributorAuthor

      Now that the stdlib-reorg PEP has been accepted, would you like you me
      to apply this patch? (Of course, I'll account for recent changes in the
      test suite.)

    9. brettcannon commented on May 20, 2008

      @brettcannon
      Member

      No renames will occur in 2.6, only in 3.0, which means this can happen
      whenever.

    10. birkenfeld commented on May 20, 2008

      @birkenfeld
      Member

      Should be safe to apply now, Benjamin.

    11. benjaminp commented on May 20, 2008

      @benjaminp
      ContributorAuthor

      On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Georg Brandl <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

      Georg Brandl <georg@python.org> added the comment:

      Should be safe to apply now, Benjamin.

      Will do today.

      Cheers,
      Benjamin Peterson
      "There's no place like 127.0.0.1."

    12. benjaminp commented on May 20, 2008

      @benjaminp
      ContributorAuthor

      Done in r63512.

    13. brettcannon commented on May 20, 2008

      @brettcannon
      Member

      I just added the note to the docs in 2.6.

    14. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions