Repository navigation
Backport: Mixing default keyword arguments with *args #46204
Description
| BPO | 1909 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @rhettinger, @terryjreedy, @pitrou, @tiran, @benjaminp, @ezio-melotti |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2010-06-26.22:56:43.858>
created_at = <Date 2008-01-22.20:04:32.225>
labels = ['interpreter-core', 'type-feature']
title = 'Backport: Mixing default keyword arguments with *args'
updated_at = <Date 2010-06-26.22:56:43.856>
user = 'https://github.com/rhettinger'bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2010-06-26.22:56:43.856>
actor = 'ezio.melotti'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2010-06-26.22:56:43.858>
closer = 'ezio.melotti'
components = ['Interpreter Core']
creation = <Date 2008-01-22.20:04:32.225>
creator = 'rhettinger'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 1909
keywords = []
message_count = 10.0
messages = ['61530', '61534', '61535', '61536', '104446', '104447', '104450', '104461', '104462', '108756']
nosy_count = 6.0
nosy_names = ['rhettinger', 'terry.reedy', 'pitrou', 'christian.heimes', 'benjamin.peterson', 'ezio.melotti']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'out of date'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue1909'
versions = ['Python 2.7']
Activity
rhettinger commentedon Jan 22, 2008
Need to backport Py3.0's functionality so that the following is valid
syntax:
tiran commentedon Jan 22, 2008
Why have you assigned the bug to me? I ain't no grammar expert.
rhettinger commentedon Jan 22, 2008
I mistakenly thought you had done this for Py3.0.
tiran commentedon Jan 22, 2008
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
You're welcome, pal! :) I've created a backport of the kw only functions
for 2.6 but that doesn't make me an expert on grammar.
terryjreedy commentedon Apr 28, 2010
Can this be closed as either fixed or out-or-date, as the case may be?
rhettinger commentedon Apr 28, 2010
It should still be done if any one has the time.
Guido approved it long ago.
terryjreedy commentedon Apr 28, 2010
Ok, I though 2.7 was in feature freeze.
Updating version.
pitrou commentedon Apr 28, 2010
Besides someone having to produce the patch, it would also need the release manager's approval (Benjamin).
benjaminp commentedon Apr 28, 2010
Wouldn't this imply a full backport of keyword only arguments? That seems unlikely at the moment.
ezio-melotti commentedon Jun 26, 2010
Now it's too late for this. Closing as out of date.