Repository navigation
Out of order commands excecution? #39612
Description
| BPO | 850110 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @mwhudson |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = 'https://github.com/mwhudson'
closed_at = <Date 2003-12-01.14:31:04.000>
created_at = <Date 2003-11-27.08:54:21.000>
labels = ['interpreter-core', 'invalid']
title = 'Out of order commands excecution?'
updated_at = <Date 2003-12-01.14:31:04.000>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/nadavhoresh'bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2003-12-01.14:31:04.000>
actor = 'nadavhoresh'
assignee = 'mwh'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Interpreter Core']
creation = <Date 2003-11-27.08:54:21.000>
creator = 'nadavhoresh'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 850110
keywords = []
message_count = 6.0
messages = ['19155', '19156', '19157', '19158', '19159', '19160']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['mwh', 'nnorwitz', 'nadavhoresh']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'not a bug'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue850110'
versions = ['Python 2.3']
Activity
nadavhoresh commentedon Nov 27, 2003
Consider the following:
How the second statement in test2 generates an error in
first one?
Nadav.
mwhudson commentedon Nov 27, 2003
Logged In: YES
user_id=6656
Well, that's just how it works. This must be documented
somewhere... see if
http://www.python.org/doc/faq/programming.html#what-are-the-rules-for-local-and-global-variables-in-python
helps (and maybe the question before).
nadavhoresh commentedon Nov 30, 2003
Logged In: YES
user_id=75473
I've looked at the FAQ and it is not seems to sesolve the
issue: In test2 "string" becomes a local variable in the
second line, while in the first line (join = string.join)
"string" should point to the (global) string module.
Nadav.
nnorwitz commentedon Dec 1, 2003
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
If a variable is local in a function, it is local throughout
the whole function. It doesn't become local at the first
assignment, but from the beginning of the function. Does
that help?
mwhudson commentedon Dec 1, 2003
Logged In: YES
user_id=6656
Well, you reopened the bug, so you're obviously not happy.
What do you want to see changed? The behaviour? No chance.
Better documentation? Feel free to supply a patch (or just
suggest wording and a location, others can do the latex).
nadavhoresh commentedon Dec 1, 2003
Logged In: YES
user_id=75473
I understand that this is just a documentation issue. I
guess that probably the interpreter builds the variables
table before executing the first line of code. But, I afraid
that I am not familiar with the internal of python to raise
such statements.
Thank you very much for your help
Nadav.