Repository navigation
GC: untrack simple objects #36632
Description
| BPO | 558745 |
|---|---|
| Nosy | @tim-one, @nascheme |
| Files |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2004-02-10.21:29:11.000>
created_at = <Date 2002-05-21.16:10:46.000>
labels = ['interpreter-core']
title = 'GC: untrack simple objects'
updated_at = <Date 2004-02-10.21:29:11.000>
user = 'https://github.com/nascheme'bugs.python.org fields:
activity = <Date 2004-02-10.21:29:11.000>
actor = 'tim.peters'
assignee = 'jhylton'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Interpreter Core']
creation = <Date 2002-05-21.16:10:46.000>
creator = 'nascheme'
dependencies = []
files = ['4283']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 558745
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 5.0
messages = ['40073', '40074', '40075', '40076', '40077']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['tim.peters', 'jhylton', 'nnorwitz', 'nascheme']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'low'
resolution = 'rejected'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue558745'
versions = ['Python 2.3']
Activity
nascheme commentedon May 21, 2002
This patch makes the GC untrack tuples that
contain no GC objects. Unfortunately it doesn't seem
to help much. The time for the 'storetups' case of
iterzip.py seems be about twice as fast (matching
Daniel Dunbar result). Loading a number of complex
MEMS Exchange web pages causes the size of gen2 to go
up to 120000 instead of 134000 without the patch.
This change doesn't seem to be worth making.
nnorwitz commentedon Apr 12, 2003
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
Neil, are you still interested in this patch?
nascheme commentedon Apr 12, 2003
Logged In: YES
user_id=35752
I'm not since it doesn't seem to help much. It looks like
no one else is either. Closing it.
tim-one commentedon Apr 13, 2003
Logged In: YES
user_id=31435
Unassigned. I agree with closing it, BTW -- it wasn't hot or
cold, it just seemed so neutral it was depressing <wink>.
tim-one commentedon Feb 10, 2004
Logged In: YES
user_id=31435
Assigned to Jeremy, cuz he wants to reconsider this.