You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
If someone submits a PR, should we invite them as an Observer? #143
After the last week at Node Interactive, we've discussed a lot around enabling people further.
One thing I'd like to discuss is if there's a first time contributor to the repo, should we automatically invite them to meetings as an observer? Of course there is no requirement to come, but I think it's a good first step to encourage further contributions.
IMHO reaching out with a personal message to the author, welcoming them, thanking for the contrib, and asking them if they would like to join, might have a higher impact.
P.S. This something we are trying out in "core". Also striving to assign a "champion" to each PR, so that the author has a human contact, and someone who is explicitly on their side.
RE: nodejs/node#16016 If it wasn't part of C&L I'd also add a few words about the process (the possible review back-and-forth and 48 hour minimal timeframe).
Activity
gr2m commentedon Oct 7, 2017
I like the idea, I’d like to try that out
refack commentedon Oct 7, 2017
IMHO reaching out with a personal message to the author, welcoming them, thanking for the contrib, and asking them if they would like to join, might have a higher impact.
refack commentedon Oct 7, 2017
P.S. This something we are trying out in "core". Also striving to assign a "champion" to each PR, so that the author has a human contact, and someone who is explicitly on their side.
RE: nodejs/node#16016 If it wasn't part of C&L I'd also add a few words about the process (the possible review back-and-forth and 48 hour minimal timeframe).
bnb commentedon Feb 16, 2018
General consensus was "no" on this, pending some other efforts around Observership. Going to close it for now.