Repository navigation
Log digest file name when updating trust #12812
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Joyce Er (joyceerhl)
merged 2 commits into
microsoft:master
from
joyceerhl:trusted-notebooks-logging
Jul 13, 2020
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd add a property to track whether we've logged this or not, else we could end up with a lot of unnecessary messages being logged, when we only need the first such log entry.
e.g.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then we'd need to remember which files we've seen before, since multiple notebook files could be edited simultaneously and we'd want to log each ipynb's corresponding digest file location at least once. Does your review still apply?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that we would have to do this logging check per file then. Don is right in that this would be so noisy with autosave on that it might not be a useful message if it logs every save.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I would just debounce it. Logging every save isn't that noisy. It's once a second.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Debouncing won't work as its possible we save a new file and that can get swallowed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Debounce will not work, as you loose updates from other files.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personally i don't see the point of logging every update, the assumption is that something will go wrong and we will end up looking at the log and the file to look for a specific hash.I find that to be an unlikely scenario.
Nope, re-read richs comments, it about tracking the last update to the file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure we need that either, anyways.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Jim Griesmer (@greazer) suggested, and I agree, that we should log this info at least once for users. It seems plausible that something might go wrong and we won't have a way of recovering that info (short of them giving us the URI to their file and us hashing it to figure out which digest file is relevant).
This info dominates the log, so we shouldn't log on each save either. And as Don mentioned, debouncing won't work. Therefore, anyone have any strong objections to me implementing this? #12812 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure sounds fine.