File an LWG issue about char_traits::eq() being underspecified #2691

Activity

1. Stephan T. Lavavej (StephanTLavavej)

   added

   LWG issue neededA wording defect that should be submitted to LWG as a new issueA wording defect that should be submitted to LWG as a new issue

   on Apr 29, 2022
2. frederick-vs-ja commented on Apr 30, 2022

   

   A. Jiang (frederick-vs-ja)

   on Apr 30, 2022

   Contributor

   More actions

   It may be difficult to make such specification when there's no operator== for T, or when equality comparison results in UB for T() (while eq is still well-defined). Not sure whether "value representation" is suitable here.
3. frederick-vs-ja commented on May 7, 2022

   

   A. Jiang (frederick-vs-ja)

   on May 7, 2022

   Contributor

   More actions

   LWG-3694 is filed now.

   🎉React with 🎉2Reacted by Stephan T. Lavavej and Igor Zhukov
4. StephanTLavavej commented on May 9, 2022

   

   Stephan T. Lavavej (StephanTLavavej)

   on May 9, 2022

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   Thank you! 😻
5. Stephan T. Lavavej (StephanTLavavej)

   closed this as completedon May 9, 2022
6. Stephan T. Lavavej (StephanTLavavej)

   added

   resolvedSuccessfully resolved without a commitSuccessfully resolved without a commit

   on May 9, 2022