You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
cli-plugins/hooks: max-message enforcement is off by one #7005
cli-plugins/hooks.ParseTemplate() currently enforces maxMessages = 10 by counting newline characters and rejecting only when strings.Count(out, "\n") > maxMessages, then returning strings.SplitN(out, "\n", maxMessages).
That makes the limit off by one:
a template that renders to 10 newline characters actually contains 11 messages
that output is currently accepted instead of rejected
SplitN(..., 10) then merges the extra line into the last returned element, so the final "message" can still contain an embedded newline
This means the "maximum 10 messages" guard can be bypassed by one extra rendered line.
Reproduce
Use the current master branch.
Call hooks.ParseTemplate() with output that contains 11 lines, for example:
strings.Repeat("line\n", 10) +"line"
Observe that no error is returned.
Observe that the returned slice has length 10, with the last element containing an embedded newline.
The relevant logic is currently in:
cli-plugins/hooks/template.go:43
cli-plugins/hooks/template.go:46
Expected behavior
A template that renders to more than 10 messages should be rejected, including the 11-line / 10-newline case.
In other words, the limit should be enforced on the number of returned messages, not just on the number of newline separators.
docker version
N/A for runtime environment. This is a source-level issue in the current master branch checkout.
Observed in local checkout at 9f16882de4.
docker info
N/A for runtime environment. This issue is in template parsing logic and does not depend on daemon configuration.
Additional Info
This looks like it was introduced by b7ab63387a (cli-plugins/hooks: limit maximum number of lines / messages).
I’m happy to send a fix with a regression test if this behavior matches the intended bug report.
For the hook max-message behavior, an off-by-one test should include both boundary values: exactly the documented maximum and maximum + 1. That makes the intended contract unambiguous and avoids future changes that pass only the rejection case. It would also help to assert the user-facing error reports the same maximum value as the docs/config option.
Activity
CZNetworks commentedon May 31, 2026
hiSandog commentedon Jun 30, 2026
For the hook max-message behavior, an off-by-one test should include both boundary values: exactly the documented maximum and maximum + 1. That makes the intended contract unambiguous and avoids future changes that pass only the rejection case. It would also help to assert the user-facing error reports the same maximum value as the docs/config option.