You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Starting with v12.0.0 the minimum node version requirement for discord.js will be >=12.0.0 to make use of features like async/await, Object.entries(), Object.values() (ES2017) etc.
This will allow us to implement features like #1376 easily and without further obstacles.
Since this will be a rather big breaking change users that want to use discord.js v12.x.x will need to update their node version to at least 12.0.0. The reason why we don't plan on supporting >=7.0.0 is that --harmony is way too unreliable and unstable in versions prior to 7.6.0 (e.g. memory leaks) .
If v12 is the minimum, for the ShardingManager, how much flexibility is there with defaulting to worker mode and using SharedArrayBuffer to share memory between instances? Workers were made stable as part of v12
Things like users, presences, and probably more could be cut down on for memory usage savings. Unfortunately I'm not as familiar with this as I started looking into it just recently.
Activity
[-]Minimum node version requirement: >=7.6.0[/-][+]Minimum node version requirement: >=8.0.0[/+]devsnek commentedon Apr 24, 2017
for build:
now: add v8(-nightly) (and v9(-nightly) when it releases)
after v11.1 is released: remove v6/v7 builds
iCrawl commentedon May 30, 2017
This is live now, forcing node 8 will be done in around 1 week or a as soon as we start using features that are not compatible with node 6 anymore.
iCrawl commentedon Jun 1, 2017
As of 375b89a this (forcing node 8) is now implemented in master.
[-]Minimum node version requirement: >=8.0.0[/-][+]Minimum node version requirement: >=10.0.0[/+]Updated to Discord.js 12
kyranet commentedon Apr 6, 2019
[-]Minimum node version requirement: >=10.0.0[/-][+]Minimum node version requirement: >=12.0.0[/+]iCrawl commentedon Feb 24, 2020
Bumped to v12
JMTK commentedon Feb 25, 2020
If v12 is the minimum, for the ShardingManager, how much flexibility is there with defaulting to
workermode and usingSharedArrayBufferto share memory between instances? Workers were made stable as part of v12Things like users, presences, and probably more could be cut down on for memory usage savings. Unfortunately I'm not as familiar with this as I started looking into it just recently.