Skip to content

CWG3049 Implicitly deleted move operation should not disable trivial relocation #2408

Closed as not planned
Closed as not planned
CWG3049 Implicitly deleted move operation should not disable trivial relocation#2408
Labels
EWGEvolution

Description

@jensmaurer
jensmaurer
opened on Aug 11, 2025

Some trivially copyable types turn out not to be trivially relocatable, per the current Working Draft.

EWG to confirm design intent here.

See CWG3049 for details.

Activity

  1. jensmaurer
    added
    EWGEvolution
    on Aug 11, 2025

  2. phalpern commented on Aug 11, 2025

    @phalpern
    phalpern
    on Aug 11, 2025 · Hidden as off-topic

  3. jensmaurer commented on Sep 30, 2025

    @jensmaurer
    jensmaurer
    on Sep 30, 2025
    MemberAuthor

    @phalpern , this paper tracker is not for technical discussions, but for administrative handling of papers and other issues. Please discuss technical merits in the appropriate subgroup of WG21.

  4. jensmaurer commented on Nov 13, 2025

    @jensmaurer
    jensmaurer
    on Nov 13, 2025
    MemberAuthor

    The trivial relocation feature was removed by P3920 R0 Wording for NB comment resolution on trivial relocation #2539.

  5. jensmaurer
    closed this as not plannedon Nov 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    EWGEvolution

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions