Skip to content

Multiecho pipeline #382

Open
Open

Description

@TamerGezici

Hi,

It seems like I will be needing to use a multiecho sequence for one of our studies. I believe aa does not support multiecho processing.

I see that people use fmriprep with TEDANA for ME. It seems the workflow goes like: some prep steps -> TEDANA -> more prep steps .... and so on.

I was thinking if it would be feasible to imitate this and use SPM for preprocessing. So we imitate fmriprep's prep steps, and start the necessary steps using SPM, add TEDANA as an aa module, and then continue the rest with SPM.

Alternatively, add fmriprep as an aa module, add TEDANA as a module, and do all preprocessing in fmriprep and then pick the outputs of fmriprep and continue on with analysis from there.

I can't decide which would be a feasible option (if any at all)

Activity

  1. tiborauer commented on Apr 11, 2023

    @tiborauer
    Member

    Both approaches could work depending on how much you prefer fmriprep over aa for preprocessing and what preprocessing you consider before and after TEDANA. I prefer aa for preprocessing for better flexibility and transparency and would like to see TEDANA as a module.
    However, if you would rather use fmriprep, then I am unsure whether you want to use aa as a pipeline because nipype might be more efficient for a Python-dominated workflow with a few steps.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions