You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[feature request] evaluate mIoU, accu, FID every N iteration #14
First, thanks for your amazing work!
In your paper, mIoU, accu, FID are evaluated to make quantitative comparison to related work.
And it seems that these evaluation codes are missing from this version of code?
I think it will be better evaluating and log (or print) these value when we training the model.
For those who what to develop a new method based on your codes (like me), the mIoU, acccu, FID curves will intuitively show us whether our work is promising or not.
Thanks!
@taesungp
Hi, thanks for your great work!
I have a question.
For FID, especially on COCO-Stuff did you split dataset into train and val and evaluate FID with 5,000 images in val, or just use 50,000 images in train?
Activity
taesungp commentedon Apr 14, 2019
Hello,
Unfortunately, we do not plan to include code for evaluation metrics because it was not written by us.
For FID, we used this code repo pretty much out of the box. https://github.com/mseitzer/pytorch-fid
For semantic segmentation score, we specified in paper which semantic segmentation network we used for evaluation.
dgrid commentedon May 19, 2019
@taesungp
Hi, thanks for your great work!
I have a question.
For FID, especially on COCO-Stuff did you split dataset into train and val and evaluate FID with 5,000 images in val, or just use 50,000 images in train?
ShihuaHuang95 commentedon Aug 27, 2019
@dgrid Have you figured out which one is used in the FID calculation? @taesungp Would you like to make this clear? Many thanks!