Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-css-flexbox-1-20171019/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Move min-width/min-height: auto definitions to css-sizing From: Oriol Brufau Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1920 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1920#issuecomment-342008468 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2103 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2103#issuecomment-360955736 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Dec/0004.html ∈
Issue 2. # Summary: Choose single option for resolving margin/padding percentages From: Rossen Atanassov Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2085 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2085#issuecomment-362000362 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/db68ee43e752fabf68fd1e776a0ac840f4d3e971 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Feb/0000.html ∈
Issue 3. # Summary: When does min-width/min-height: auto compute to auto vs zero? From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2230 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/cf709be33562b27fddd4200824d876378f47fe6d Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Feb/0000.html ∈
Issue 4. # Summary: Make min-width: auto compute to auto always, resolve to zero as needed From: Daniel Holbert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-362114572 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-365688138 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-370625542
Issue 5. # Summary: Min-content sizing too smart to be web compatible From: François Remy Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2353 Open
Issue 6. # Summary: Make order do semantic reordering From: Robert Utasi Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405#issuecomment-371528202 ???: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405#issuecomment-371590054 Closed: Rejected Resolved: previous CSSWG resolutions, Web platform architectural principles, etc.
Issue 7. # Summary: Use more formal language in note From: Nadya678 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2431 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2431#issuecomment-372120318 Closed: Accepted Changes: (note was removed entirely due to issue 2)