Dated Draft: hhttps://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-display-3-20151015/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: table-caption & table-cell should use flow-root not flow From: Oriol Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0372.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0064.html ∈ Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈
Issue 2. # Summary: Define <br> and <wbr> From: Ian Hickson, Tab Atkins Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0155.html ∈ Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610#issuecomment-274911199 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0065.html ∈ Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0066.html ∈ Closed: Deferred to HTML https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2291 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈
Issue 3. # Summary: Shouldn't root be in-flow? From: fantasai Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0332.html ∈ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈ Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈
Issue 5. # Summary: Interaction of run-in and ::first-letter From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0330.html ∈ Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650#issuecomment-274908554 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈
Issue 6. # Summary: Inconsistent implementation of 'display: flex' on <fieldset> From: glanbin Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321#issuecomment-232788709 Closed: Invalid Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 7. # Summary: Consider removing 'display: run-in' From: Ms2ger Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339#issuecomment-234783783 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion -
Issue 8. # Summary: Define interaction of 'display: contents' and replaced elements From: Simon Pieters Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540#issuecomment-285214950 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sQbKYcM6mmRueGJBozPGer_UwQDMyv+eww3kOBAHC7mg@mail.gmail.com ⎆ -
Issue 9. # Summary: Display value visible to AT From: Dave Cramer, Sara Soueidan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560#issuecomment-270094051 Closed: OutOfScope Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 10. # Summary: Effect of 'display: contents' on counter scoping From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/674 Response: Closed: Accepted Note: Still needs edits in css-lists-3. Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈
Issue 11. # Summary: Why is introduction normative? Also defining “element”? From: Anne van Kesteren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680#issuecomment-270103941 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 12. # Summary: 'display: contents' on root element From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805#issuecomment-266991346 Closed: Invalid
Issue 13. # Summary: “run-in box with 'display: flow'” nonsensical From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832#issuecomment-270106512 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 14. # Summary: "flow-root" harmful From: Binyammin Laukstein Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275141140 Closed: Invalid Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275208753
Issue 15. # Summary: Rename flow-root From: Simon Fraser Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964#issuecomment-274638719 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com ⎆ Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com ⎆
Issue 16. # Summary: Tooltips are wrong From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834#issuecomment-280431244 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 17. # Summary: HTML shouldn't be a normative reference From: Bert Bos Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011#issuecomment-286501361 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 18. # Summary: What are form controls? From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024#issuecomment-285215276 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 19. # Summary: Anonymous boxes inheriting from `display: contents` From: Oriol, Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1249 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301942276 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈ Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301953751
Issue 20. # Summary: Propagation of text-decoration applied to `display: contents` From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136#issuecomment-301938274 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9a8bdda32c4d22a2cbc98d6c3724b72f651b6b3 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈
Issue 21. # Summary: `display: block` seems to define flex and grid items as block-level From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292656095 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292738919 Response: Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 22. # Summary: Display erroneously groups ruby with atomic inlines From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180#issuecomment-292638199 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 23. # Summary: Block containers can also establish an inline formatting context From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301622704 Cloed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301630234 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-314583112 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 24. # Summary: Revisions to *-level definitions From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294637052 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294646968 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-301623329 Closed: Invalid
Issue 25. # Summary: Do table captions participate in BFC or TFC? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189#issuecomment-301626461 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 26. # Summary: Table contins invalid values From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225#issuecomment-301631015 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 27. # Summary: list-item definition implies invalid keyword combos are valid From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226#issuecomment-301631288 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 28. # Summary: Do contents and none have outer display type? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227#issuecomment-301631748 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 29. # Summary: Run-in erroneously excludes blocks that establish inline formatting context From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228#issuecomment-301632605 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2f6354014360662e2aef0e25da433852d4fa8b3a Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 30. # Summary: Blockification rules not backwards-compatible for inline-block From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-301634850 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-305246779 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-313211986 Open: =WG= Discuss.
Issue 31. # Summary: Rename “block container” to “flow container” From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301635795 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editor discretion Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301639507
Issue 32. # Summary: Text nodes vs text runs From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281#issuecomment-301942809 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈
Issue 33. # Summary: Inheritance with 'display: contents' and ::first-line From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310 Response: Open
Issue 34. # Summary: Define 'display: contents' as a type of box From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299120942 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299247618 Closed: Retracted
Issue 35. # Summary: Define more sensible blockification for layout-internal types From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340#issuecomment-301641681 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5aaca4a7030e818cd02ac2d93137e1cd1d295bae Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion
Issue 36. # Summary: Inlinification, recursion, and ruby vs display definitions From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301643296 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301944521 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-313204672 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈
Issue 37. # Summary: Does display: contents apply to ::before ::after From: Emilio Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345#issuecomment-313205067 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html ∈
Issue 38. # Summary: Define interaction of various box tree fixups From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301878155 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301888405 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302250667 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302748058 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f5b79e99bb8fc9ebea4ed956ed3420bc69b90786 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 39. # Summary: Root inline box vs anonymous inline boxes From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301832460 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301833956 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301872204 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6aeeabe060c8d8c1397ef2196a4e3a62da964d5e Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 40. # Summary: Inlinification by display type or anon box fixup? From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390#issuecomment-313211238 Closed: Retracted
Issue 41. # Summary: Computation of 'float' vs 'position' without a box From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436#issuecomment-313215820 Open
Issue 42. # Summary: Are run-in contents inside ::first-line? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313246128 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editor discretion Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313249402
Issue 43. # Summary: “Becoming a formatting context” section is a mess From: Oriol, fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-313225448 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563 Open
Issue 44. # Summary: Is 'position: marker' out-of-flow? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458#issuecomment-313224602 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 45. # Summary: Does run-in algo recurse? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460#issuecomment-314593762 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c9f1bb16d0e5077b9bca7027a7d7252eeff5abf1 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 46. # Summary: Parallel construction should be pairwise disjoint (editorial) From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1470 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09212af80e10e4e3e57965bb27b2de3fdcd86e06 Closed: Fixed Resolved: Editorial
Issue 47. # Summary: BFC definition not quite right From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313240736 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313247457 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313263022 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313252408 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313266528 Open
Issue 48. # Summary: Run-in fixup vs block-in-inline fixup From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472#issuecomment-313242917 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 49. # Summary: Note wrt inheritance of ::first-line through 'display: contents'. From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473#issuecomment-313247421 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 50. # Summary: Display types: on elements or on boxes? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314569164 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314583675
Issue 51. # Summary: Should 'inline-foo' and 'inline foo' be distinct? From: David Baron Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486 Open
Issue 52. # Summary: At-risk list omits three-component values From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1490 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/394c62f72fda4ac824c9ce204a99bf991b9e6471 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 53. # Summary: Discrepencies in run-in From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491#issuecomment-314570280 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 54. # Summary: Serialization of list-item values not listed From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493#issuecomment-314572350 Closed: OutOfScope (to CSSOM) / Rejected (for editorial) Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial
Issue 55. # Summary: Missing definition of 'inline-list-item' From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495#issuecomment-306282449 Open
Issue 56. # Summary: Redesign 'flow-root' keyword and related features From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496 Open
Issue 57. # Summary: Inlinification doesn't inlinify layout-internal boxes From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582 Response: Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 58. # Summary: <legend> with no box example is confusing From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494427 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494885 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313498359 Open Resolved: Editorial
Issue 59. # Summary: Blocks that contain only inlines, establishing BFC+IFC? From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553 Open
Issue 60. # Summary: Define establishing a BFC as a flow-root only thing via used values From: Oriol Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550 Open