Hostname: page-component-8678677fb7-ngjx9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-10-07T06:04:54.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The anatomy of controversy, from Charlottesville to Rome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Joshua Arthurs*
Affiliation:
Department of History, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA

Abstract

This article compares two recent memory controversies in the United States and Italy – the removal of the Robert E. Lee statue in Charlottesville, Virginia and the Legge Fiano, the abortive ban on Fascist propaganda proposed by Emanuele Fiano and the Partito Democratico – in order to identify a common set of challenges now confronting liberal democracies on both sides of the Atlantic. While acknowledging the longue durée of memory politics surrounding the Confederacy and Fascism respectively, the article argues that disputes over their monuments and symbols must also be situated in terms of contemporary debates over national identity, race, populism, citizenship and speech.

Italian summary

Attraverso un paragone tra due controversie recenti negli Stati Uniti e nell’Italia – la rimozione della statua del generale sudista Robert E. Lee a Charlottesville, Virginia e il dibattito sulla Legge Fiano contro l’apologia del fascismo – questo articolo esamina una serie di sfide affrontate da democrazie liberali da entrambi i lati dell’Atlantico. Anche riconoscendo la ‘lunga durata’ della politica della memoria, sia del sudismo che del fascismo, l’autore colloca queste polemiche nel contesto di dibattiti attuali attorno all’identità nazionale, il razzismo, il populismo, e i diritti di cittadinanza e di libera espressione.

Information

Type
Special Issue
Copyright
© 2019 Association for the Study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)