Skip to content

fs.op.canonical still defined in terms of absolute(p, base) #1620

Description

@cubbimew

fs.op.canonical says it is equivalent to "absolute(p, base).", but absolute no longer takes a base argument as of p0492r2

More likely to be editorial, absolute still has a base argument in the synopsis of [fs.filesystem.syn], though it doesn't have it in [fs.op.absolute]

Activity

  1. jwakely commented on Apr 20, 2017

    @jwakely
    Member

    This seems non-editorial.

  2. jwakely commented on Apr 20, 2017

    @jwakely
    Member

    The synopsis part is though, p0492 said "Change [fs.op.absolute] and update the synopsis in [fs.filesystem.syn] accordingly:" but I failed to do that.

  3. jwakely commented on Apr 20, 2017

    @jwakely
    Member

    The synopsis is fixed by ae6271c

  4. cubbimew commented on Apr 21, 2017

    @cubbimew
    ContributorAuthor

    all right, I'll send the non-editorial bit to lwg.

  5. cubbimew commented on Apr 24, 2017

    @cubbimew
    ContributorAuthor

    This is now LWG 2956

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    lwgIssue must be reviewed by LWG.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions